4.2 Article

Bio-remediation of acephate-Pb(II) compound contaminants by Bacillus subtilis FZUL-33

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 94-99

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.010

关键词

Acephate-Pb2+; Bacillus subtilis; Biodegradation; Biomineralization

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2014CB846003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41372346, 21577018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Removal of Pb2+ and biodegradation of organophosphorus have been both widely investigated respectively. However, bio-remediation of both Pb2+ and organophosphorus still remains largely unexplored. Bacillus subtilis FZUL-33, which was isolated from the sediment of a lake, possesses the capability for both biomineralization of Pb2+ and biodegradation of acephate. In the present study, both Pb2+ and acephate were simultaneously removed via biodegradation and biomineralization in aqueous solutions. Batch experiments were conducted to study the influence of pH, interaction time and Pb2+ concentration on the process of removal of Pb2+. At the temperature of 25`degrees C, the maximum removal of Pb2+ by B. subtilis FZUL-33 was 381.31 11.46 mg/g under the conditions of pH 5.5, initial Pb2+ concentration of 1300 mg/L, and contact time of 10 min. Batch experiments were conducted to study the influence of acephate on removal of Pb2+ and the influence of Pb?* on biodegradation of acephate by B. subtilis FZUL-33. In the mixed system of acephate-Pb2+, the results show that biodegradation of acephate by B. subtilis FZUL-33 released POI', which promotes mineralization of Pb2+. The process of biodegradation of acephate was affected slightly when the concentration of Pb2+ was below 100 mg/L. Based on the results, it can be inferred that the B. subtilis FZUL-33 plays a significant role in bio-remediation of organophosphorus-heavy metal compound contamination. (C) 2016 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据