4.6 Article

The Association of MEG3 lncRNA with Nuclear Speckles in Living Cells

期刊

CELLS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11121942

关键词

lncRNA; MEG3; nuclear bodies; nuclear speckles; nucleus; splicing; transcription; live-cell imaging

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Common Fund 4D Nucleome Program grant [U01DK127422-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using live-cell imaging, we found that MEG3 lncRNA is a transient resident of nuclear speckles and its association with this nuclear body is modulated by the levels of transcription and splicing activities in the cell.
Nuclear speckles are nuclear bodies containing RNA-binding proteins as well as RNAs including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). Maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3) is a nuclear retained lncRNA found to associate with nuclear speckles. To understand the association dynamics of MEG3 lncRNA with nuclear speckles in living cells, we generated a fluorescently tagged MEG3 transcript that could be detected in real time. Under regular conditions, transient association of MEG3 with nuclear speckles was observed, including a nucleoplasmic fraction. Transcription or splicing inactivation conditions, known to affect nuclear speckle structure, showed prominent and increased association of MEG3 lncRNA with the nuclear speckles, specifically forming a ring-like structure around the nuclear speckles. This contrasted with metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma (MALAT1) lncRNA that is normally highly associated with nuclear speckles, which was released and dispersed in the nucleoplasm. Under normal conditions, MEG3 dynamically associated with the periphery of the nuclear speckles, but under transcription or splicing inhibition, MEG3 could also enter the center of the nuclear speckle. Altogether, using live-cell imaging approaches, we find that MEG3 lncRNA is a transient resident of nuclear speckles and that its association with this nuclear body is modulated by the levels of transcription and splicing activities in the cell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据