4.7 Article

The HACOR Score Predicts Worse in-Hospital Prognosis in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123509

关键词

COVID-19; non-invasive respiratory support; pneumonia; respiratory failure; HACOR score

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study tested the ability of the HACOR score, a scale based on clinical and laboratory parameters, to predict adverse outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). The results showed that a high HACOR score was associated with the need for intubation or in-hospital death, making it a significant predictor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19-related ARF.
Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) is widely used in COVID-19 patients, although high rates of NIRS failure are reported. Early detection of NIRS failure and promptly defining the need for intubation are crucial for the management of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). We tested the ability of the HACOR score, a scale based on clinical and laboratory parameters, to predict adverse outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with ARF. Four hundred patients were categorized according to high (>5) or low (<= 5) HACOR scores measured at baseline and 1 h after the start of NIRS treatment. The association between a high HACOR score and either in-hospital death or the need for intubation was evaluated. NIRS was employed in 161 patients. Forty patients (10%) underwent intubation and 98 (25%) patients died. A baseline HACOR score > 5 was associated with the need for intubation or in-hospital death in the whole population (HR 4.3; p < 0.001), in the subgroup of patients who underwent NIRS (HR 5.2; p < 0.001) and in no-NIRS subgroup (HR 7.9; p < 0.001). In the NIRS subgroup, along with the baseline HACOR score, also 1-h HACOR score predicted NIRS failure (HR 2.6; p = 0.039). In conclusion, the HACOR score is a significant predictor of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19-related ARF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据