4.7 Article

Assessment of the Management of Patients with Chronic Pain Referred to a Specialized Pain Unit: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study (the DUO Project)

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133586

关键词

chronic pain; pain unit; quality indicators; analgesics; opioids; gender differences

资金

  1. Neuraxpharm Spain, S.L.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to assess the quality of treatment for chronic pain patients referred to specialized pain units. The findings show that 9.8% of patients were not receiving any analgesic treatment before referral, and 88.1% of patients experienced treatment modifications after referral. Women patients had higher levels of pain severity and changes in the diagnosis of the underlying condition.
A multicenter cross-sectional study was designed to assess the quality of treatment of 1190 patients with chronic pain at the time of referral to a specialized pain unit. A total of 119 physicians from 77 pain units throughout Spain collected 23 indicators of the quality of care from 10 consecutive clinical records of chronic pain patients (5 men, 5 women). Degenerative spinal diseases (38.6%) and lumbosciatic pain (29.8%) were the most common etiologies. At the time of referral to the pain unit, 9.8% of patients were not receiving any analgesic treatment. Treatment was modified in 88.1% of the patients by adding adjuvant drugs, adding opioids or increasing the doses of analgesic medications, and using analgesic techniques. Women had higher percentages of osteoarthritis, headache and fibromyalgia as the cause of pain, longer duration of pain and severe pain intensity, and a higher proportion of changes in the diagnosis of the underlying condition with which they had been referred to the pain unit. Improvements should be made in the patient management and referral protocols not only in the clinics prior to patient referral to the pain unit, but also in the pain units themselves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据