4.7 Article

Changes in the Choroidal Thickness following Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123375

关键词

bevacizumab; central serous chorioretinopathy; choroidal thickness

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korean government (MIST) [NRF-2020R1C1C1010497]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab injection on chronic central serous chorioretinopathy and found that it significantly improved visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Early changes in choroidal thickness were associated with the therapeutic response.
We evaluated the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB) on choroidal thickness, and studied its association with the therapeutic response in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). The clinical features of 78 eyes with chronic CSC treated with IVB from October 2014 to June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Visual acuity (VA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and sub-foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were analyzed at baseline, 1 month following initial IVB, and the last follow-up examination. Cases showing complete recovery (resolved eyes; n = 60) were compared with those with persistent subretinal fluid (refractory eyes; n = 18). The relationship between the potential risk factors and subretinal fluid resolution was examined using logistic regression. SFCT was significantly decreased along with the CRT following IVB at the resolved state. SFCT reduction following 1 month of IVB was notably greater in the resolved eyes. The association of refractory eyes with hypertension (p = 0.003) and a thinner baseline SFCT (p = 0.024) was significant. In most of the patients with chronic CSC, VA and CRT remarkably improved following treatment with IVB. Early changes in the SFCT following IVB were associated with the therapeutic response. Patients with hypertension and a thinner baseline SFCT could be unresponsive to IVB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据