4.7 Article

Management of Preschool Wheezing: Guideline from the Emilia-Romagna Asthma (ERA) Study Group

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164763

关键词

allergen sensitization; episodic viral wheezing; multiple trigger wheezing; pediatric pulmonology; wheezing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preschool wheezing is an umbrella term for diseases with different observable and measurable phenotypes. There is currently a lack of knowledge on the management of preschool wheezing. These guidelines aim to fill this knowledge gap and provide recommendations for the management of wheezing disorders in preschool children.
Preschool wheezing should be considered an umbrella term for distinctive diseases with different observable and measurable phenotypes. Despite many efforts, there is a large gap in knowledge regarding management of preschool wheezing. In order to fill this lack of knowledge, the aim of these guidelines was to define management of wheezing disorders in preschool children (aged up to 5 years). A multidisciplinary panel of experts of the Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy, addressed twelve different key questions regarding the management of preschool wheezing. Clinical questions have been formulated by the expert panel using the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) and systematic reviews have been conducted on PubMed to answer these specific questions, with the aim of formulating recommendations. The GRADE approach has been used for each selected paper, to assess the quality of the evidence and the degree of recommendations. These guidelines represent, in our opinion, the most complete and up-to-date collection of recommendations on preschool wheezing to guide pediatricians in the management of their patients, standardizing approaches. Undoubtedly, more research is needed to find objective biomarkers and understand underlying mechanisms to assess phenotype and endotype and to personalize targeted treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据