4.8 Article

Instability mediated self-templating of drop crystals

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 27, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq0828

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF via grants NSF CAREER [CBET 2042930]
  2. NSF FMRG [CMMI 2037097]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The breakup of liquid threads into droplets is a common phenomenon in engineering and natural environments. Previous studies have mainly focused on axisymmetric systems, while the physics of multiple threads and the interaction between threads and symmetry-breaking boundaries have not been explored. This study discovered that closely spaced liquid threads printed in an immiscible bath form crystal-like lattices of droplets. By controlling the injection flow rate and nozzle translation speed, the lattice pattern can be adjusted, overcoming the limitations of structural versatility in existing fluid manipulation paradigms. Furthermore, it was found that these drop crystals have the ability to self-correct.
The breakup of liquid threads into droplets is prevalent in engineering and natural settings. While drop formation in these systems has a long-standing history, existing studies typically consider axisymmetric systems. Conversely, the physics at play when multiple threads are involved and the interaction of a thread with a symmetry breaking boundary remain unexplored. Here, we show that the breakup of closely spaced liquid threads sequentially printed in an immiscible bath locks into crystal-like lattices of droplets. We rationalize the hydrodynamics at the origin of this previously unknown phenomenon. We leverage this knowledge to tune the lattice pattern via the control of injection flow rate and nozzle translation speed, thereby overcoming the limitations in structural versatility typically seen in existing fluid manipulations paradigms. We further demonstrate that these drop crystals have the ability to self-correct and propose a simple mechanism to describe the convergence toward a uniform pattern of drops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据