4.8 Article

Single-cell antigen-specific landscape of CART infusion product identifies determinants of CD19-positive relapse in patients with ALL

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj2820

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stand-Up-to-Cancer (SU2C) Convergence 2.0 Grant
  2. Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering [2012-38215]
  3. Stand Up To Cancer
  4. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer
  5. program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The differences in antigen-specific activation states are associated with CD19-positive relapse in ALL patients after CAR-T cell therapy. The deficiency of T helper 2 function and low frequency of early memory T cells are characteristics of relapse. These findings may help predict therapeutic outcomes and guide strategies to improve T cell function for long-term remission.
A notable number of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients develop CD19-positive relapse within 1 year after receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. It remains unclear if the long-term response is associated with the characteristics of CART cells in infusion products, hindering the identification of biomarkers to predict therapeutic outcomes. Here, we present 101,326 single-cell transcriptomes and surface protein landscape from the infusion products of 12 ALL patients. We observed substantial heterogeneity in the antigen-specific activation states, among which a deficiency of T helper 2 function was associated with CD19-positive relapse compared with durable responders (remission, >54 months). Proteomic data revealed that the frequency of early memory T cells, rather than activation or coinhibitory signatures, could distinguish the relapse. These findings were corroborated by independent functional profiling of 49 patients, and an integrative model was developed to predict the response. Our data unveil the molecular mechanisms that may inform strategies to boost specific T cell function to maintain long-term remission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据