4.8 Article

Large-area self-standing thin film of porous hydrogen-bonded organic framework for efficient uranium extraction from seawater

期刊

CHEM
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 2749-2765

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.07.009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [CSIR/JRF/31/028(0272)/2019-EMR-1, CSIR-CSMCRI/MLP0043, HRDG/YSA-2021/05/17(53)22, CSIR-CSMCRI/MLP0045]
  2. CSIR-HRDG [9119-A]
  3. PRIS [CSIR-CSMCRI-118/2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new method for uranium extraction from seawater is reported. By designing an organic framework material with selective binding sites, high extraction efficiency and stability are achieved. The large-area thin films produced from this material have tunable thickness and increased surface area, enabling effective uranium extraction from seawater.
Uranium extraction from seawater (UES) efficiency is limited by the material design, such as U-selective binding sites, their uniform distribution, surface area exposure, diffusivity, and stability. Herein, we report a U-selective single-component hydrogen-bonded organic framework ((HOF)-H-CSMCRI-1) of phenoxy-imine synthons conju-gated to pyridyl tectons with varied pore dimensions of similar to 3.6-similar to 3.8 angstrom, resulting in flow-through channels and 328 m(2)/g BET surface area. The (HOF)-H-CSMCRI-1 shows a 3D robust network of hydrogen bonds (O-H center dot center dot center dot O, C-H center dot center dot center dot O, and O-H center dot center dot center dot N) supported by pi-pi stacking, exhibiting excellent hydrolytic stability under broad pH range (pH 1-10). Relative to other framework materials, the (HOF)-H-CSMCRI-1 is easily processable and regenerable. Further processing of (HOF)-H-CSMCRI-1 yields large-area free-standing thin films (TFCHs) of tunable thickness from 40 to 500 nm with enhanced surface area (550 m(2)/g). TFCH shows significant UES capacities of similar to 11 mg/g within 5 days and 17.9 mg/g in 30 days from natural seawater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据