4.8 Article

Synthesis of magnesium nanoparticle for NIR-II-photoacoustic-imaging-guided synergistic burst-like and H2 cancer therapy

期刊

CHEM
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 2990-3007

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.07.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874024, 22027805]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0210800]
  3. joint research projects of the Health and Education Commission of Fujian Province [2019-WJ-20]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2020J02012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, diameter- and shape-controlled magnesium nanoparticles were synthesized and applied in near infrared-II photoacoustic and bubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging and cancer therapy. These nanoparticles continuously generated H-2 in the tumor to induce cancer cell death, exhibiting superior synergistic tumor inhibition effects.
Metallic magnesium is a promising platform for H-2 cancer therapy, whereas the available Mg particles & rsquo; undesirable diameter and shape greatly hinder its therapeutic application. Herein, we first reported the diameter-and shape-controlled synthesis of Mg nanoparticles, including hexagonal nanosheet (similar to 80 & ndash;320 nm), nanoflower (similar to 100 & ndash; 250 nm), and small nanoparticle (mean 65 nm), by a one-pot method. As a proof of concept, pH-sensitive polymer-coated Mg nanoflowers were prepared and applied in NIR (near infrared)-II photoacoustic and bubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging and cancer therapy. It continuously generated H-2 in the tumor because the acidic tumor environment triggered the disassembly of the polymeric shell, leading to the reaction of Mg and water. The generated H-2 bubbles not only induced transient cavitation and mechanically ruptured lysosomes but also disturbed the cellular energy metabolism and induced high oxidative stress simultaneously, leading to cancer-cell death. Thus, this drug-free therapy method presented superior synergistic tumor inhibition effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据