4.5 Article

Reduction of microbial diversity in grassland soil is driven by long-term climate warming

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 1054-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-022-01147-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Genomic Science Program [DE-SC0004601, DE-SC0010715]
  2. Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of Oklahoma
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M641327, 2019T120101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the negative effects of anthropogenic warming and decreased soil moisture on soil microbial diversity, and also reveals a positive correlation between microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning.
Soil microbes control the cycling of carbon, but how these communities will respond to climate changes is unknown. Here, 7 years of artificial warming decreased microbial richness and diversity, driven mostly by soil moisture loss. Anthropogenic climate change threatens ecosystem functioning. Soil biodiversity is essential for maintaining the health of terrestrial systems, but how climate change affects the richness and abundance of soil microbial communities remains unresolved. We examined the effects of warming, altered precipitation and annual biomass removal on grassland soil bacterial, fungal and protistan communities over 7 years to determine how these representative climate changes impact microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. We show that experimental warming and the concomitant reductions in soil moisture play a predominant role in shaping microbial biodiversity by decreasing the richness of bacteria (9.6%), fungi (14.5%) and protists (7.5%). Our results also show positive associations between microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functional processes, such as gross primary productivity and microbial biomass. We conclude that the detrimental effects of biodiversity loss might be more severe in a warmer world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据