4.6 Article

Magnetic-Field-Enhanced H2S Sensitivity of Cu2O/NiO Heterostructure Ordered Nanoarrays

期刊

ACS SENSORS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.2c00495

关键词

Cu2O; NiO; Heterostructures; H2S sensor; Magnetic field

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11704168, 11404158]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2021QA055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the enhancement of gas sensitivity in Cu2O/NiO heterostructured nanoarrays for H2S gas detection using a magnetic field. The results show that the response rate of the nanoarrays is significantly improved by the magnetic field, especially at low concentrations.
Magnetism is a promising external intervention for gas sensitivity based on a heterogeneous interfacial structure caused by the regulation of the heterogeneous interface conductivity and the surface oxygen adsorption. In this study, Cu2O/NiO heterostructure-ordered nanoarrays were prepared with a two-dimensional (2D) electro-deposition in situ assembly method for H2S gas detection at room temperature under the action of a magnetic field. The nanoarrays were multibarrier structures with a strictly periodic structure that was greater than hundreds of microns in size. The experimental data confirmed that the response of SO ppm of H2S based on the nanoarrays was improved by nearly 61% with a relatively weak magnetic field. Particularly at a low concentration (<= 20 ppm), the effect of the magnetic field enhancement on the sensitivity was more obvious. We attributed the enhancement of the gas sensitivity with the magnetic field to the regulation of the Cu2O-NiO interface conductance and the surface oxygen adsorption. This study demonstrated that a magnetic field could significantly enhance the gas sensitivity based on heterostructures. Results of this study provide an important reference for the application of magnetism in gas detection and the design of new gas-sensitive materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据