4.6 Article

The Role of Ion Transport in the Failure of High Areal Capacity Li Metal Batteries

期刊

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 2701-2710

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01114

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy through the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program (Battery500 Consortium) [DE-EE0007764]
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS1542148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advancements in electrolyte research have improved the cycle life of Li metal batteries, but often at the expense of moderate areal capacity. This study reveals that high areal capacity Li batteries fail due to shorting events when paired with high-concentration electrolytes. The transport properties of the electrolytes play a significant role in this phenomenon.
Recent advancements in electrolyte research have substantially improved the cycle life of Li metal batteries (LMBs) but often under moderate areal capacity. The design principles overwhelmingly emphasize the reduction of electrolyte reactivity toward Li. In this work, we find that high areal capacity (>6 mAh cm(-2)) Li||sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) batteries fail primarily due to shorting events when paired with four types of localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs), which is correlated with electrolyte transport properties, including ionic conductivity and Sand's capacity. These LHCE systems, despite their high Coulombic efficiencies for Li metal cycling, produce macroscopically non-uniform Li deposits when operating under transport limitation. This deficiency leads to short circuit over repeated cycling, as evidenced by a quantitative, statistical analysis of SEM images. Based on these insights, we fabricated a 2 Ah pouch cell, which demonstrates a cell energy density of >260 Wh kg(-1) for more than 70 cycles. Our findings emphasize the significance of the bulk transport properties of electrolytes and the statistical morphological information on cycled Li for long-life LMBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据