4.6 Article

Cartilage-bone inspired the construction of soft-hard composite material with excellent interfacial binding performance and low friction for artificial joints

期刊

FRICTION
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 1177-1193

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-022-0645-2

关键词

Ti6Al4V alloy; hydrogel; soft-hard interface; friction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired by natural joint structure, researchers designed a soft-hard integrated material that simulates the structure of cartilage and bone. The combination of hydrogel layer and titanium substrate provides high load-bearing and excellent tribological properties.
Inspired by the cartilage-bone structure in natural joints, soft-hard integrated materials have received extensive attention, which are the most promising candidates for artificial joints due to their combination of excellent load-bearing properties and lubricating properties. The latest progress showed that the combination of hydrogel and titanium alloy can realize a bionic natural joint lubrication system on the surface of titanium alloy. However, obtaining a tough interface between the hydrogel (soft and wet) and the titanium substrate (hard and dry) is still a great challenge. Here, we designed a soft (hydrogel)-hard (Ti6Al4V) integrated material with outstanding combination, which simulates the structure and function of cartilage-bone in the natural joint. The load-bearing properties, binding performance, and tribological behaviors for different forms of the soft-hard integrated materials were investigated. The results showed that the hydrogel layer and Ti6Al4V substrate possess ultra-high interfacial toughness (3,900 J/m(2)). In addition, the combination of the hydrogel layer and Ti6Al4V substrate provided a good lubrication system to endow the soft (hydrogel)-hard (Ti6Al4V) integrated material with high load-bearing and excellent tribological properties. Therefore, this study provided an effective strategy for prolonging the service life of Ti6Al4V in the biomedical field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据