4.1 Review

Review of novel and supplemental approvals of the targeted cancer drugs by the Food and Drug Administration in 2021

期刊

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 191-207

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10781552221112015

关键词

Cancer; targeted drugs; novel approvals; supplemental approvals; food and drug administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article summarizes the most recent clinical trial results of targeted cancer drugs approved by the FDA in 2021, reflecting the changing treatment landscape of solid malignancies. Targeted cancer treatments are becoming increasingly important in the treatment of malignant diseases.
Objective This review aims to present the most recent results from clinical trials of targeted cancer drugs that led to the Food and Drug Administration approval in 2021 and reflect the changing treatment landscape of solid malignancies. Data Sources Novel approvals and supplemental approvals in 2021 were retrieved from the official web page of the Food and Drug Administration (Drugs@FDA). This review did not include approvals for generics, biosimilars, imaging, and diagnostics agents. Data Summary This review included 10 novel drugs approved for 11 indications and 10 already-approved drugs approved for 21 indications by the Food and Drug Administration in 2021. Novel approvals mainly were related to treating an orphan disease. In addition, one-third of the supplemental approvals were given for neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, while the number of indications for each tumor site was as follows: gastrointestinal (7), genitourinary (5), skin (3), lung (2), breast (2), thyroid (1), and cervix (1). Conclusions Targeted cancer treatments are gaining more importance than ever in treating malignant diseases. As the approval of targeted cancer drugs provides a possibility for patients and this trend is expected to continue in the future, it remains vital for healthcare providers to stay up-to-date with newer therapeutic options.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据