4.5 Article

Beneficial Effects of Repeated Washed Microbiota Transplantation in Children With Autism

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.928785

关键词

autism; clinical efficacy; gastrointestinal symptoms; sleep disorders; treatment course; washed microbiota transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of repeated washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The results showed that WMT significantly improved ASD symptoms, sleep disorders, and gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as reduced systemic inflammation. Additional WMT courses led to more obvious improvements in ASD symptoms.
ObjectiveWhile fecal microbiota transplantation is demonstrated to improve symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), it remains unclear whether additional treatment courses yield better results. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of repeated washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) in children with ASD. MethodsRetrospective data from children who were serially treated with WMT, including ASD symptoms, sleep disorders, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and white blood cell (WBC) and globulin levels were obtained. The effect of WMT on children with ASD and whether additional WMT courses led to a further improvement in symptoms were assessed. ResultsAberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), Childhood Autism Rating Scale, and Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) scores, the proportion of children with constipation and abnormal fecal forms, and WBC and globulin levels were all significantly lower in ASD children after WMT. More WMT treatment courses led to significantly lower scores on the ABC and SDSC. ConclusionWMT significantly improved ASD and GI symptoms and sleep disorders in children with ASD, and reduced systemic inflammation. Additional WMT courses led to more obvious improvements in ASD symptoms within three treatment courses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据