4.6 Article

Topography Control of Micro-Nanosized Anatase Coating on Magnesium Alloy

期刊

COATINGS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12081063

关键词

topography; micro; nanostructure; anatase; coating; magnesium alloy

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Specialized Project of Henan Province [182102210120, 222102230023]
  2. Key Scientific Research Project of College and University of Henan Province [22A430035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anatase coatings with controllable micro/nanoscale characteristics were successfully prepared on an MgZn alloy surface via solvothermal route. The coatings exhibited good corrosion resistance and inhibition of platelet aggregation, and could adsorb endothelial cells.
Constructing surface topographies in the micro- or nanometer range is an effective way to improve the biocompatibility of biomaterials. For the present work, anatase coatings with controllable micro/nanoscale characteristics were successfully prepared on an MgZn alloy surface via solvothermal route, and their formation mechanisms are discussed. The features of the as-prepared coatings were characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), a transmission electron microscope (TEM), an atomic force microscope (AFM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and a contact angle goniometer. The corrosion behavior of the coatings was also evaluated by testing the open circuit potential (OCP) in SBF (Simulated Body Fluid). The results show that a gradual variation of the anatase coating morphologies was obtained through adjusting the solvothermal reaction conditions. With the increase of NH4F concentration in the solution, the cross-combined anatase nanosheets became more dispersed. The micro/nanostructured anatase coatings provide the MgZn alloy with good corrosion resistance, which increased with the density of anatase nanosheets in the coatings. In addition, the coatings exhibit the inhibition of platelet aggregation, and the micro/nano structures can also adsorb endothelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据