4.6 Review

Closing cones create conical lamellae in secondary osteonal bone

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220712

关键词

bone; lamellae; secondary osteon; closing cone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides a perspective on the relationship between the geometry of the bone formation front and the shape of lamellae produced. It concludes that the 'closing cone' bone formation front results in cone-shaped lamellae in mature secondary osteons. Visualizing and measuring three-dimensional lamellar shape is necessary for accurate micromechanical simulations.
Lamellae are sheets of mineralized collagen 1-20 mu m thick, extending over hundreds of mu m in bone tissue, occupying bone's structural hierarchy at a level above collagen fibres and osteocytes, and below osteons and trabeculae. Osteons are tubular arrangements of lamellae surrounding central neurovascular canals. Lamellae in osteons are usually described as concentric cylinders based on their annular appearance in transverse section. In this review, I provide a perspective on current understanding of the relationship between geometry of the bone formation front and the shape of lamellae produced at it, reaching the conclusion that the 'closing cone' bone formation front in secondary osteonal remodelling must necessarily result in cone-shaped lamellae in the mature secondary osteon. Secondary osteons replace primary osteons through a tunnelling process of bone turnover, meaning that conical lamellae may become more common in older and damaged bone which is at greatest risk of fracture. Visualization and measurement of three-dimensional lamellar shape over hundreds of microns is needed to provide data for accurate micromechanical simulations. Treating secondary osteonal lamellae as a 'stack of cones' rather than 'nested cylinders' may have important implications for our appreciation of bone's function as a load-bearing tissue and of its behaviour in fracture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据