4.7 Article

Microstructure and corrosion resistance of novel b-type titanium alloys manufactured by selective laser melting

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.021

关键词

Titanium alloys; Additive manufacturing; Selective laser melting; Microstructure; Corrosion; Corrosion products

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research BMBF [13FH5I03IA]
  2. Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Freiburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective laser melting enables the production of complex and functional parts from difficult processable materials. This study compares the microstructure and corrosion resistance of novel I3-type titanium alloys with traditional titanium alloys, revealing that the new alloys exhibit superior corrosion resistance.
Due to its unique characteristics selective laser melting offers the possibility to manufacture highly complex and functional parts out of otherwise difficult processable materials. One example is I3-type titanium alloys, which have very promising properties for various engineering applications. Two novel I3-type alloys Ti-42Nb and Ti-20Nb-6Ta were compared with commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy in this study. All four lightweight materials were SLM-processed and the microstructure and corrosion resistance were investigated. While pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V showed only the martensitic a0-phase, Ti-42Nb consists solely of the I3-phase and Ti-20Nb-6Ta of the orthorhombic martensitic a00-phase. Potentiodynamic polarization showed a superior corrosion resistance for both I3-type alloys, whereas Ti-42Nb performed slightly better than Ti-20Nb -6Ta. Released V and Al could be clearly observed for the Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy by mass spectrometry due to corrosion processes, in contrast the release of Nb or Ta was hardly detected for the new alloys. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据