4.7 Article

Optimal parameters for the explosive welding of TP 270C pure titanium and SUS 821L1 duplex stainless steel

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.031

关键词

Explosive welding; Weldability window; Titanium; Duplex stainless steel; SPH

资金

  1. project of Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering (Ningbo University)
  2. State key Laboratory of Precision Blasting
  3. Ministry of Education
  4. [CJ202207]
  5. [06070001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the optimal parameters for the weldability window of pure titanium and a new duplex stainless steel. By conducting experiments and simulations, the lower and left limits were determined based on physical quantities such as the jet, pressure, and melting. The findings suggest that the jet and left limit are related to the ratio of pressure and tensile strength.
In this study, the optimal parameters for the weldability window of pure titanium and a new duplex stainless steel (TP 270C/SUS 821L1) were explored, particularly the lower and left limits. A series of experiments were conducted, and the details of physical quantities during welding, such as the jet, pressure, and melting, were obtained via the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method. The simulation results demonstrated how these physical quantities changed with the welding parameters near the lower and left limits. The lower limit was determined according to experimental and simulation results, while the left limit was determined according to experimental findings. Via simulation, it was found that the jet and left limit are related to the ratio of the pressure and tensile strength (P/sigma(b)). The experimental results provided new notions regarding the left limit. Through the weldability window analysis. The optimal parameters of explosive welding should be slightly above the lower limit; an area near the left limit also offered optimal parameters for welding. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据