期刊
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.948114
关键词
context modulation; schizophrenia; lateralization; spatial orientation; negative
类别
This study compares the contextual modulation between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls in the rod and frame test. The results show that only the variability measure is sensitive enough to distinguish between the two groups. Patients with schizophrenia have greater inconsistency in rod alignment, and those with more severe negative symptoms have larger variability in rod alignment.
BackgroundContextual processing dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) is not uniform and task-dependent. In SCZ, studies on the rod and frame test (RFT), which evaluates contextual modulation of verticality perception, are sparse. A main study that utilized a two-alternative forced choice design for judging rod verticality reported equivalent strength of RFT contextual modulation in healthy controls and SCZ. The current study aims to uncover any potential differences in contextual modulation between controls and SCZ with an adjustment method on a computerized RFT. Materials and methodsA total of 17 healthy controls and 15 SCZ aligned an oriented rod to their perceived vertical with a computer mouse under four randomized frame presentations: absent frame, non-tilted (Frame(0 degrees)), or tilted by 18 degrees leftward (Frame(-18 degrees)) or rightward (Frame(+18 degrees)). Rod deviation error was assigned a negative or positive value when aligned leftward or rightward, respectively, of 0 degrees. Signed and absolute errors, the rod and frame effect (RFE), and intra-individual variability (inconsistency) were used for analysis. ResultsThere was no group difference in rod alignment errors or derived measures, except that SCZ displayed greater inconsistency in rod alignment, compared to controls. The negative symptom scale (PANSS-N) scores correlated positively with the variability measure and with unsigned Frame(-18 degrees) error. ConclusionsOnly the variability measure was sensitive enough to distinguish between controls and SCZ. SCZ with more severe negative symptoms had larger variability in rod alignment, probably reflecting a state of indifference. The larger deviation errors only with a leftward tilted frame, as PANSS-N scores increased, may indicate a lateralized attentional abnormality that is correlated with severity of symptoms in SCZ.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据