4.6 Article

Vertically-Ordered Mesoporous Silica Films for Electrochemical Detection of Hg(II) Ion in Pharmaceuticals and Soil Samples

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.952936

关键词

vertically-ordered mesoporous silica film; mercury ion; electrochemical detection; pharmaceutical; soil

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21904117, 82160341]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY20B050007, LY21B050003]
  3. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Key Project [2022GXNSFDA035060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, vertically-ordered mesoporous silica films were prepared and utilized for rapid and simple detection of mercury ions in pharmaceuticals and soil samples. The films displayed cationic selectivity and strong electrostatic interaction with Hg2+, enabling quantitative detection with a wide linear range and low limit of detection.
Rapid and simple determination of mercury ion (Hg2+) in pharmaceuticals and soil samples is vital for human health and the environmental monitoring. Vertically-ordered mesoporous silica films (VMSF) supported by the indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode surface were prepared by electrochemically assisted self-assembly method and utilized for electrochemical detection of Hg2+. Owing to the negatively charged channel walls and ultrasmall pore diameter, VMSF displays obvious cationic selectivity and has highly electrostatic interaction for Hg2+, giving rise to the strong electrochemical signals. By recording the anodic stripping signals of adsorbed Hg2+ using differential pulse voltammetry, quantitative detection of Hg2+ was achieved with a wide linear range (0.2 mu M-20 mu M) and a low limit of detection (3 nM). Furthermore, considering the anti-fouling and anti-interference capacity of VMSF, the proposed VMSF/ITO sensor has been successfully applied to detect Hg2+ in pharmaceuticals and soil samples without tedious pretreatment processes of samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据