4.6 Article

Modulating the Electron Transporting Properties of Subphthalocyanines for Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.886522

关键词

subphthalocyanines; non-fullerene acceptor; photovoltaics; perovskite solar cells; electron-transport materials

资金

  1. Spanish MINECO [CTQ 2017-85393-P]
  2. Program for Centers of Excellence in R7D (MINECO) [SEV 2016-0686]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [424101351]
  4. Swiss National Foundation (SNF) [200021E_186,390]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the use of SubPcs as organic non-fullerene electron transport materials (ETMs) in perovskite solar cells (PSCs). By analyzing the influence of SubPc peripheral functionalization on the efficiency and stability of the devices, it is found that insertion of a SubPc layer significantly improves the device stability. The impact of SubPc layer thickness is also evaluated.
The lack of organic non-fullerene ETMs with good electron transport and device stability is an important problem for the further development and commercialization of perovskite solar cells. Herein, the use of SubPcs as ETMs in PSCs is explored. To this end, we analyze the influence of SubPc peripheral functionalization on the efficiency and stability of p-i-n PSCs. Specifically, ETMs based on three SubPcs (with either six or twelve peripheral fluorine and chlorine atoms) have been incorporated into PSCs with the perovskite layer deposited by solution processing (CsFAMAPbIBr). The device performance and morphology of these devices are deeply analyzed using several techniques, and the interfacial effects induced by the SubPcs are studied using photoluminescence and TR-PL. It is observed that the device stability is significantly improved upon insertion the SubPc layer. Moreover, the impact of the SubPc layer-thickness is assessed. Thus, a maximum power conversion efficiency of 13.6% was achieved with the champion device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据