4.5 Review

Nitrogen-Containing Heterocyclic Compounds Obtained from Monoterpenes or Their Derivatives: Synthesis and Properties

期刊

TOPICS IN CURRENT CHEMISTRY
卷 380, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s41061-022-00399-1

关键词

Monoterpenes; Monoterpenoids; Nitrogen-containing heterocycles; Biological activity; Catalytic activity

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation [1021051703312-0-1.4.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The directed transformation of available natural compounds is a promising research area in organic and medicinal chemistry for finding effective drug substances. This review aims to summarize the literature data on the preparation and properties of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds synthesized from monoterpenes/monoterpenoids and their nearest derivatives from 2000 to 2021.
Directed transformation of available natural compounds with native biological activity is a promising area of research in organic and medicinal chemistry aimed at finding effective drug substances. The number of scientific publications devoted to the transformation of natural compounds and investigations of their pharmacological properties, in particular, monoterpenes and their nearest derivatives, increases every year. At the same time, the chemistry of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds has been actively developed since the 1950s after the news that the benzimidazole core is an integral part of the structure of vitamin B-12. At the time of writing this review, the data on chemical modifications of monoterpenes and their nearest derivatives leading to formation of compounds with a nitrogen-containing heterocycle core have not been summarized and systematized in terms of chemical transformations. In this review, we tried to summarize the literature data on the preparation and properties of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds synthesized from monoterpenes/monoterpenoids and their nearest derivatives for the period from 2000 to 2021.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据