4.7 Article

Valorization of soy waste through SSF for the production of compost enriched with Bacillus thuringiensis with biopesticide properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 126-131

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.029

关键词

Waste valorization; Soy fiber residues; Bacillus thuringiensis; Soil amendment; Solid state fermentation; Compost

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economia y Competitividad [CTM 2012-33663]
  2. FEDER
  3. Peruvian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing generation of biodegradable wastes from different human activities from industrial to agricultural including home and recreational activities. On the other hand, agricultural and horticultural activities require significant amounts of organic amendments and pesticides. In this framework, the present study evaluates the viability of soy fiber residue valorization as organic soil amendment with biopesticide properties through aerobic solid-state fermentation (SSF) in the presence of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The experiments were performed first under sterile and non-sterile conditions at lab scale using 115 g of sample and controlled temperature (30 degrees C). Bt growth was successful in sterile conditions, obtaining 6.2 x 10(11) CFU g(-1) DM and 8.6 x 10(10) spores g(-1) DM after 6 days. Bt survived on solid culture under non-sterile conditions (3.8 x 10(9) CFU g(-1) DM and 1.3 x 10(9) spores g(-1) DM). Further, the valorization process was scaled-up to 10 L reactors (2300 g) under non-sterile conditions obtaining a final stabilized material with viable Bt cells and spores (9.5 x 10(7) CFU g(-1) DM and 1.1 x 10(8) spores g(-1) DM in average) after 9 days of SSF. These results confirm the possibility of managing biodegradable wastes by their transformation to a waste derived soil amendment with enhanced biopesticide effect, in comparison to traditional compost using a valuable and low-cost technique (SSF). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据