4.7 Article

A Molecular Logic Gate for Developing AND Logic Probes and the Application in Hepatopathy Differentiation

期刊

ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 837-844

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.2c00387

关键词

-

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [Z200018]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [U1867209]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2021YFA1601400, 2017YFA0506300]
  4. Special Foundation of Beijing Municipal Education Commission [3500-12020123]
  5. Li Ge-Zhao Ning Life Science Youth Research Foundation [LGZNQN202004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a novel molecular logic gate that enables a double-controlled release of intact functional molecules by combining two disease-associated stimuli. Compared to traditional monoresponsive probes, these AND logic probes show significantly improved signal-to-background contrast and have been successfully used in hepatopathy diagnosis.
Accurate diagnosis and therapy are challenging because most diseases lack a single biomarker that distinguishes them from other disorders. A solution would enhance targeting accuracy by using AND-gated combinations of two diseaseassociated stimuli. Here, we report a novel AND molecular logic gate, enabling a double-controlled release of intact functional molecules. Benefiting from a significant difference in intrawith the presence of both stimuli. According to this finding, several AND logic probes have been developed that respond to a broad scope of stimuli and show remarkably improved signal-tobackground contrast compared to those of monoresponsive probes. In addition, an AND logic probe that is responsive to monoamine oxidase (MAO) and leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) has been constructed for hepatopathy diagnosis. It works efficiently in living cells and mouse models. Of note, this probe can successfully differentiate cirrhotic from hepatitis B by testing the blood samples from patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据