4.4 Article

Joint uplink and downlink scheduling and UAV trajectory design in the presence of multiple unfriendly jammers and eavesdroppers

期刊

PHYSICAL COMMUNICATION
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.phycom.2022.101657

关键词

Unmanned aerial vehicle; Secure communication; Uplink and downlink scheduling; Nonconvex optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61901254]
  2. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2020Z0660S6001]
  3. Deanship of Research Oversight and Coordination (DROC) at KFUPM, Saudi Arabia [INCS2110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates secure uplink and downlink communications between an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and multiple user equipments (UEs) in the presence of multiple ground-based eavesdroppers (EVs) and unfriendly jammers. A novel secure transmission scheme is proposed to maximize the average secrecy rate (ASR) by optimizing the UAV trajectory, transmit power, and transmission scheduling. The proposed scheme achieves a better ASR than the benchmark schemes.
In this paper, we investigate secure uplink and downlink communications between an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and multiple user equipments (UEs) in the presence of multiple ground-based eavesdroppers (EVs) and unfriendly jammers. In order to guarantee the secure uplink and downlink transmissions, we consider a novel secure transmission scheme, which involves a power splitting based downlink transmission and scheduling of uplink and downlink transmission. Explicitly, we aim to maximize the average secrecy rate (ASR) by optimizing the UAV trajectory, the transmit power of the UAV and UEs, and scheduling of uplink and downlink transmission. Although the formulated problem is nonconvex, we propose an efficient solution by jointly applying the techniques of block coordinate descent and successive convex approximation. Numerical results show that the proposed scheme achieves a better ASR than the benchmark schemes. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据