4.7 Article

Robust and adaptable quantum key distribution network without trusted nodes

期刊

OPTICA
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 812-823

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.458937

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0302600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61475148, 61575183, 61622506, 61627820, 61675189, 62105318]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021M693098]
  4. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an MDI-QKD networking scheme that is robust against environmental disturbance and adaptable to multi-user access. It allows multiple users to generate keys simultaneously in a multi-user scenario.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) networks are promising to serve large numbers of users with information-theoretic secure communication. In QKD networks, the detection-safe protocol, termed measurement-device-independent (MDI) QKD, can naturally enhance realistic security by supporting untrusted measurement nodes. However, the environmental disturbances to quantum states degrade the performance of multi-user communication. Here we propose an MDI-QKD networking scheme with robustness against environmental disturbance and adaptability to multi-user access, where more than two users can generate keys simultaneously regardless of aligning reference frames and compensating channel disturbance on polarization. To achieve this, we introduce the reference-frame-independent protocol as well as a polarization-compensation-free method, design a multi-user measurement unit, and combine it with original two-user units. The scheme is experimentally demonstrated for the improvement of network robustness and adaptability in multi-user scenarios, and the time and device costs of disturbance compensation can be saved from O(N) to O(1) for an N-user network. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据