4.5 Article

A model of empathic reflection based on the philosophy of Edith Stein: A discussion paper

期刊

NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103389

关键词

Education; Empathy; Experiential learning; Nursing students; Reflective practice

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a model designed to promote reflection on empathy development in nursing students. The authors have developed an approach based on the philosophy of Edith Stein and provide a narrative example of the model in action in an acute care setting.
Background: Empathy development is an integral aspect of nurse education in several countries. Empathy sup-ports person-centred care provision by aiding effective communication and promoting feelings of wellbeing by helping people feel understood.Aim: The development of empathy in nursing students is best facilitated through experiential learning and reflective practice, although to date, there are no reflective models specifically designed for this purpose. It is the aim of this paper to present a model designed to promote reflection on the development of empathy.Design: The authors have developed an approach to empathic reflection based on the philosophy of Edith Stein. Methods: In this paper we outline the Empathic Reflection model which emphasises the need for educator support and an appreciative approach. We then present a narrative example of the model in action in an acute care setting.Results: We have developed a three-stage model to support experiential learning about the development of empathy for nursing students.Conclusions: This discussion paper explores an interesting area for future nursing research about empathy development through experiential learning and reflective practice. Educators can contribute to the promotion of empathy by working in partnership with students to explore previously held beliefs which might act as barriers to empathic care provision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据