4.8 Article

Cyclic-anion salt for high-voltage stable potassium-metal batteries

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac134

关键词

cyclic anion; low concentration; additive-free electrolyte; high-voltage; potassium-metal batteries; solid-electrolyte interface

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22005093, U20A20247, 51922038]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2022JJ20011]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531119200156]
  4. R. A. Bowen Professorship funds at Clemson University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the use of cyclic anion electrolytes based on hexafluoropropane-1,3-disulfonimide to mitigate 'dead K' formation and enhance high-voltage stability in potassium-metal batteries. The strategy is also applicable to lithium and sodium-metal battery technologies.
Electrolyte anions are critical for achieving high-voltage stable potassium-metal batteries (PMBs). However, the common anions cannot simultaneously prevent the formation of 'dead K' and the corrosion of Al current collector, resulting in poor cycling stability. Here, we demonstrate cyclic anion of hexafluoropropane-1,3-disulfonimide-based electrolytes that can mitigate the 'dead K' and remarkably enhance the high-voltage stability of PMBs. Particularly, even using low salt concentration (0.8 M) and additive-free carbonate-based electrolytes, the PMBs with a high-voltage polyanion cathode (4.4 V) also exhibit excellent cycling stability of 200 cycles with a good capacity retention of 83%. This noticeable electrochemical performance is due to the highly efficient passivation ability of the cyclic anions on both anode and cathode surfaces. This cyclic-anion-based electrolyte design strategy is also suitable for lithium and sodium-metal battery technologies. This work proposes a novel cyclic anion salt strategy for high-voltage potassium metal batteries, which is also suitable for other alkali metal batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据