4.8 Review

A critical review of mineral-microbe interaction and co-evolution: mechanisms and applications

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac128

关键词

biomineralization; co-evolution; interactions; microbe; mineral; nutrients

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42192500, 42192503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mineral-microbe interactions are vital in understanding environmental change and the formation of ore deposits. Microbes impact the dissolution, transformation, and precipitation of minerals, which in turn affects major geological events. Despite progress made, there are still important questions that require further research.
Mineral-microbe interactions play important roles in environmental change, biogeochemical cycling of elements and formation of ore deposits. Minerals provide both beneficial (physical and chemical protection, nutrients, and energy) and detrimental (toxic substances and oxidative pressure) effects to microbes, resulting in mineral-specific microbial colonization. Microbes impact dissolution, transformation and precipitation of minerals through their activity, resulting in either genetically controlled or metabolism-induced biomineralization. Through these interactions, minerals and microbes co-evolve through Earth history. Mineral-microbe interactions typically occur at microscopic scale but the effect is often manifested at global scale. Despite advances achieved through decades of research, major questions remain. Four areas are identified for future research: integrating mineral and microbial ecology, establishing mineral biosignatures, linking laboratory mechanistic investigation to field observation, and manipulating mineral-microbe interactions for the benefit of humankind. Minerals and microbes interact and coevolve through flow of energy and exchange of matter, and their interactions play important roles in driving major geological events and ore deposit formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据