4.8 Article

Oceanospirillales containing the DMSP lyase DddD are key utilisers of carbon from DMSP in coastal seawater

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01304-0

关键词

Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP); Dimethylsulfide (DMS); DNA-stable isotope probing (DNA-SIP); Oceanospirillales; DddD DMSP lyase; Seawater; Biogeochemical sulfur cycling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91751202, 41730530]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0601303, 2018YFE0124100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [202172002]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/P012671, NE/S001352]
  5. Leverhulme trust [RPG-2020-413]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a novel DNA-SIP approach to identify key microorganisms actively utilizing DMSP and DMS as carbon sources in marine environments. The findings highlight the diversity in microbial utilization of DMSP and the complexity of pathways involved, emphasizing the importance of microbial identification in marine environments.
Background: Ubiquitous and diverse marine microorganisms utilise the abundant organosulfur molecule dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP), the main precursor of the climate-active gas dimethylsulfide (DMS), as a source of carbon, sulfur and/or signalling molecules. However, it is currently difficult to discern which microbes actively catabolise DMSP in the environment, why they do so and the pathways used. Results: Here, a novel DNA-stable isotope probing (SIP) approach, where only the propionate and not the DMS moiety of DMSP was C-13-labelled, was strategically applied to identify key microorganisms actively using DMSP and also likely DMS as a carbon source, and their catabolic enzymes, in North Sea water. Metagenomic analysis of natural seawater suggested that Rhodobacterales (Roseobacter group) and SAR11 bacteria were the major microorganisms degrading DMSP via demethylation and, to a lesser extent, DddP-driven DMSP lysis pathways. However, neither Rhodobacterales and SAR11 bacteria nor their DMSP catabolic genes were prominently labelled in DNA-SIP experiments, suggesting they use DMSP as a sulfur source and/or in signalling pathways, and not primarily for carbon requirements. Instead, DNA-SIP identified gammaproteobacterial Oceanospirillales, e.g. Amphritea, and their DMSP lyase DddD as the dominant microorganisms/enzymes using DMSP as a carbon source. Supporting this, most gammaproteobacterial (with DddD) but few alphaproteobacterial seawater isolates grew on DMSP as sole carbon source and produced DMS. Furthermore, our DNA-SIP strategy also identified Methylophaga and other Piscirickettsiaceae as key bacteria likely using the DMS, generated from DMSP lysis, as a carbon source. Conclusions: This is the first study to use DNA-SIP with C-13-labelled DMSP and, in a novel way, it identifies the dominant microbes utilising DMSP and DMS as carbon sources. It highlights that whilst metagenomic analyses of marine environments can predict microorganisms/genes that degrade DMSP and DMS based on their abundance, it cannot disentangle those using these important organosulfur compounds for their carbon requirements. Note, the most abundant DMSP degraders, e.g. Rhodobacterales with DmdA, are not always the key microorganisms using DMSP for carbon and releasing DMS, which in this coastal system were Oceanospirillales containing DddD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据