4.5 Article

Dolutegravir twice-daily dosing in children with HIV-associated tuberculosis: a pharmacokinetic and safety study within the open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority ODYSSEY trial

期刊

LANCET HIV
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 E627-E637

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00160-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Penta Foundation
  2. ViiV Healthcare, UK Medical Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of twice-daily dosing of dolutegravir in children receiving rifampicin for HIV-associated tuberculosis. The results showed that twice-daily dosing of dolutegravir was safe and effective in overcoming the enzyme-inducing effect of rifampicin in children, providing a practical antiretroviral therapy option for children with HIV-associated TB.
Background Children with HIV-associated tuberculosis (TB) have few antiretroviral therapy (ART) options. We aimed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir twice-daily dosing in children receiving rifampicin for H IV-associated TB. Methods We nested a two-period, fixed-order pharmacokinetic substudy within the open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority ODYSSEY trial at research centres in South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Children (aged 4 weeks to <18 years) with HIV-associated TB who were receiving rifampicin and twice-daily dolutegravir were eligible for inclusion. We did a 12-h pharmacokinetic profile on rifampicin and twice-daily dolutegravir and a 24-h profile on once-daily dolutegravir. Geometric mean ratios for trough plasma concentration (C-trough), area under the plasma concentration time curve from 0 h to 24 h after dosing (AUC(0-24 h)), and maximum plasma concentration (C-max) were used to compare dolutegravir concentrations between substudy days. We assessed rifampicin C-max on the first substudy day. All children within ODYSSEY with HIV-associated TB who received rifampicin and twice-daily dolutegravir were included in the safety analysis. We described adverse events reported from starting twice-daily dolutegravir to 30 days after returning to once-daily dolutegravir. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02259127), EudraCT (2014-002632-14), and the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN91737921). Findings Between Sept 20, 2016, and June 28, 2021, 37 children with HIV-associated TB (median age 11.9 years [range 0.4-17.6], 19 [51%] were female and 18 [49%] were male, 36 [97%] in Africa and one [3%] in Thailand) received rifampicin with twice-daily dolutegravir and were included in the safety analysis. 20 (54%) of 37 children enrolled in the pharmacokinetic substudy, 14 of whom contributed at least one evaluable pharmacokinetic curve for dolutegravir, including 12 who had within-participant comparisons. Geometric mean ratios for rifampicin and twice-daily dolutegravir versus once-daily dolutegravir were 1.51 (90% CI 1.08-2.11) for C-trough,C- 1.23 (0.99-1.53) for AUC(0-24 h), and 0.94 (0.76-1.16) for C-max. Individual dolutegravir C(trough )concentrations were higher than the 90% effective concentration (ie, 0.32 mg/L) in all children receiving rifampicin and twice-daily dolutegravir. Of 18 children with evaluable rifampicin concentrations, 15 (83%) had a C-max of less than the optimal target concentration of 8 mg/L. Rifampicin geometric mean C-max was 5.1 mg/L (coefficient of variation 71%). During a median follow-up of 31 weeks (IQR 30-40), 15 grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred among 11 (30%) of 37 children, ten serious adverse events occurred among eight (22%) children, including two deaths (one tuberculosis-related death, one death due to traumatic injury); no adverse events, including deaths, were considered related to dolutegravir. Interpretation Twice-daily dolutegravir was shown to be safe and sufficient to overcome the rifampicin enzyme-inducing effect in children, and could provide a practical ART option for children with HIV-associated TB. Copyright (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据