4.4 Article

Family support in intensive care units during COVID-19 visit ban: A multinational Delphi Study during first COVID-19 wave

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103308

关键词

Communication; COVID-19; Critical care; Family; Isolation; Visiting ban

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the opinions and experiences of healthcare professionals, former patients, and their families during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. It found that family support in the intensive care unit was perceived as highly important, and virtual contact through video calls and websites was implemented to establish confidence in the treatment.
Objectives: This study assessed opinions and experiences of healthcare professionals, former patients and family members during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and focuses on challenges in family-centred care for intensive care unit patients and affected families.Research methodology/Design: A two-round modified Delphi process assessed the opinions and experiences of experts such as healthcare professionals, former patients and their families (n = 151). Setting: This study was conducted across four countries in Europe.Results: In total, 121 participants (response rate 80.13%) answered the first Delphi round; the second was answered by 131 participants (response rate 86.75%). Participants perceived family support in the intensive care unit as highly important during the COVID-19 pandemic. Enabling contact amongst patients, families and cli-nicians is regarded as essential to build hope and confidence in the treatment and the recovery process. The extraordinary situation led to the implementation of new communication structures such as video calls and websites.Conclusion: A consensus was reached between healthcare professionals that virtual contact is essential for pa-tients with COVID-19 and their families during visit restrictions. This should be done to establish confidence in the treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据