4.6 Article

Case report: An EEG captured case of migralepsy/migraine aura-triggered seizures

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.953224

关键词

migralepsy; visual aura; ictal headache; homonymous hemianopsia; visual hallucinations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Migraine and epilepsy are common chronic neurological disorders with similar presentation of paroxysmal attacks. This case report describes a male patient with a history of migraine who presented with new onset symptoms and visual disturbances. Through EEG examination, the clinical symptoms were confirmed to be caused by epileptic seizures. The article also discusses the confusion in diagnostic criteria for migraines, epilepsy, and related syndromes.
IntroductionMigraine and epilepsy are common chronic neurological disorders presenting with paroxysmal attacks of transient cerebral dysfunction, followed by subsequent return to baseline between episodes. The term migralepsy has been proposed to define migraine-triggered epileptic seizures classified by the ICHD-III as a complication of migraine with an aura. CaseA 55-year-old man with a 30-year history of migraine without aura presented with a new onset left parietal pain accompanied by visual disturbances occurring up to 20 times per day. His visual distortions included kaleidoscopic vision, flashes of shadows, and a right superior quadrantanopia lasting 20 min. He described discrete 2-min episodes of scintillating scotomas in his right visual field. Ictal EEG demonstrated a left occipital onset focal aware seizure with his clinical symptoms. The patient was started on valproic Acid and has remained asymptomatic. DiscussionThe diagnostic criteria as set out by the ICHD-III for migralepsy and other syndromes with migrainous and ictal features remain confusing for practitioners as there is much overlap in clinical manifestations of these entities. EEG should be obtained when ictal features are noted among patients presenting with headache.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据