4.8 Article

Immunogenicity of a vaccinia virus-based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine candidate

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.911164

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; vaccine; vaccinia virus; spike protein

资金

  1. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [CIFMS 2021-1-I2M-038]
  2. National Key Plan for Scientific Research and Development of China [2018YFE0107600, 2022YFE020378]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018ZX10301408-003]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82072288]
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CCI-132561]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vaccinia virus Tiantan strain was used as a vector to express the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and strong antibody and T-cell responses were detected in mice. The sera from vaccinated mice showed robust neutralizing activity against various SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the omicron variant. This study suggests the potential for developing a new type of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine using the vaccinia virus vector.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines provide essential tools for the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. A number of technologies have been employed to develop SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, including the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 particles, mRNA to express viral spike protein, recombinant spike proteins, and viral vectors. Here, we report the use of the vaccinia virus Tiantan strain as a vector to express the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. When it was used to inoculate mice, robust SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific antibody response and T-cell response were detected. Sera from the vaccinated mice showed strong neutralizing activity against the ancestral Wuhan SARS-CoV-2, the variants of concern (VOCs) B.1.351, B.1.617.2, and the emerging B.1.1.529 (omicron). This finding supports the possibility of developing a new type of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine using the vaccinia virus vector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据