4.8 Article

Markers of Immune Cell Exhaustion as Predictor of Survival in Surgically-Treated Early-Stage NSCLC

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.858212

关键词

HAVCR2; immune transcriptomics; NSCLC; TIM-3; immune cell exhaustion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composition of immune cells in surgically removed tissues is associated with survival in NSCLC patients. Levels of immune cell exhaustion markers may indicate immune dysfunction and are associated with survival after curative surgery in NSCLC.
BackgroundTumor tissue as well as regional lymph nodes are removed during curative surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These tissues provide a unique snapshot of the immune cell composition at the time of surgery. We investigated the immune landscape in matched tumor tissue, tumor bearing (tb) and non-tumor bearing (ntb) N1 as well as N2 lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with NSCLC and its relation to survival. MethodsInternal hospital databases were screened for surgically treated NSCLC patients for whom tumor tissue, tbLNs as well as N1 and N2 ntbLNs were available. Clinical as well as demographic data were extracted from hospital records. Expression profiling of 770 immune-related genes was performed using the PanCancer IO 360 panel by NanoString Technologies. ResultsWe identified 190 surgically treated patients of whom 16 fulfilled inclusion criteria and had sufficient archived tissue. The Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score in N1 tumor-free lymph nodes was associated with OS. TIM-3 expression was inversely correlated with TIDE scores in affected LNs, N1 and N2 ntbLNs. Levels of CD8 expression were significantly higher in TIDE High compared to TIDE Low patients. TIM-3 and PD-L1 were selected for the final model for OS in multivariate regression in more than one tissue. ConclusionLevels of immune cell exhaustion markers may indicate a dysfunctional immune status and are associated with survival after curative surgery in NSCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据