4.8 Review

Major Molecular Factors Related to Leishmania Pathogenicity

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.847797

关键词

anti-parasite drugs; macrophages; leishmaniasis; pathoantigenic determinants; infective

资金

  1. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leishmaniasis is a significant global health problem with a high number of new cases and a large population at risk. Understanding the determinants of Leishmania pathogenicity and its survival mechanisms is important for developing effective treatments and vaccines.
Leishmaniasis is a major health problem with 600k - 1M new cases worldwide and 1 billion at risk. It involves a wide range of clinical forms ranging from self-healing cutaneous lesions to systemic diseases that are fatal if not treated, depending on the species of Leishmania. Leishmania sp. are digenetic parasites that have two different morphological stages. Leishmania parasites possess a number of invasive/evasive and pathoantigenic determinants that seem to have critical roles in Leishmania infection of macrophages which leads to successful intracellular parasitism in the parasitophorous vacuoles. These determinants are traditionally known as virulence factors, and are considered to be good targets for developing specific inhibitors to attenuate virulence of Leishmania by gene deletions or modifications, thus causing infective, but non-pathogenic mutants for vaccination. Pathway of biosynthesis is critical for keeping the parasite viable and is important for drug designing against these parasites. These drugs are aimed to target enzymes that control these pathways. Accordingly, maintaining low level of parasitic infection and in some cases as a weapon to eradicate infection completely. The current paper focuses on several virulence factors as determinants of Leishmania pathogenicity, as well as the metabolites produced by Leishmania to secure its survival in the host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据