4.6 Article

Stability and Rupture of Liquid Crystal Bridges under Microgravity

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12081092

关键词

smectic liquid-crystals; Rayleigh-Plateau instability; TEXUS suborbital rocket; microgravity

资金

  1. German Aerospace Center (DLR) [50WM1430, 50WM1744, 50WM2054]
  2. German Science Foundation (DFG) [STA 425-40/3]
  3. Book Processing Charge by the Open Access Publication Fund of Magdeburg University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid-crystal columns were prepared and observed under microgravity conditions during suborbital rocket flights. The collapse of the columns was observed in the isotropic and nematic phases, but they survived in the smectic A and C mesophases due to the different yield stress of the material. The research provides important experimental data for understanding the behavior of liquid-crystal materials in microgravity.
Liquid-crystal columns were prepared and observed under microgravity aboard suborbital TEXUS rocket flights. The microgravity phase of each flight lasted for approximately six minutes. We tested structures in different liquid-crystalline mesophases. In the isotropic and nematic phases, the Rayleigh-Plateau instability led to the collapse of the columns. However, in the smectic A and C mesophases, it was found that the columns survived the extension to slenderness ratios (length/diameter) of over 4.5 (and in one case, more than 6). The liquid-crystalline material in the millimeter-sized columns was macroscopically disordered. Thus, regular shell-like internal layer structures that stabilized the columns can be excluded. Instead, the reason for their persistence was the yield stress of the material, which is quite different for the different mesophases. In the columnar mesophase, the cylindrical bridge even survived the strong deceleration when the rocket re-entered the atmosphere. During the breakup of the filaments, the neck thinning dynamics were determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据