4.6 Article

Smart-Median: A New Real-Time Algorithm for Smoothing Singing Pitch Contours

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12147026

关键词

pitch contour smoother; pitch detection; singing analysis

资金

  1. Maynooth University
  2. Higher Education Authority in the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science in Ireland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a new smoother algorithm for pitch contours and compares it with 15 other existing algorithms. The proposed algorithm is shown to smooth the contours more accurately, highlighting the importance of designing smoother algorithms based on contour types and intended applications.
Featured Application Some of the applications of this study are improving pitch estimation, removing outliers and errors, singing analysis, voice analysis, singing assessment, and singing information retrieval. Pitch detection is usually one of the fundamental steps in audio signal processing. However, it is common for pitch detectors to estimate a portion of the fundamental frequencies incorrectly, especially in real-time environments and when applied to singing. Therefore, the estimated pitch contour usually has errors. To remove these errors, a contour smoother algorithm should be employed. However, because none of the current contour-smoother algorithms has been explicitly designed to be applied to contours generated from singing, they are often unsuitable for this purpose. Therefore, this article aims to introduce a new smoother algorithm that rectifies this. The proposed smoother algorithm is compared with 15 other smoother algorithms over approximately 2700 pitch contours. Four metrics were used for the comparison. According to all the metrics, the proposed algorithm could smooth the contours more accurately than other algorithms. A distinct conclusion is that smoother algorithms should be designed according to the contour type and the result's final applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据