4.3 Article

Hyaluronic acid production by utilizing agro-industrial waste cane molasses

期刊

3 BIOTECH
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13205-022-03265-5

关键词

Streptococcus zooepidemicus; Molasses; Hyaluronic acid; Fermentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyaluronic acid has unique applications in the cosmetics and medical industries, and fermentation of Streptococcus zooepidemicus is the best method for its production. Utilizing cane molasses as a carbon source can optimize the fermentation conditions for hyaluronic acid.
Hyaluronic acid is a polysaccharide endowed with distinctive biological and physiological competencies. Given its queer properties, hyaluronic acid has exclusive praxis in the cosmetics and medical industries. The surmounting demand for hyaluronic acid is the propulsion behind the necessity for finding the amenable ways for its production. Fermentation progression of Streptococcus zooepidemicus is reckoned as the superlative prompt and ambient approach for hyaluronic acid fabrication. For the unabated advancements in the industrial production of hyaluronan, industrial byproducts utilization is a fateful stile. The recent perusal is to optimize the fermentation production conditions of hyaluronic acid using cane molasses (a byproduct of sugar production) as a carbon source. The impact of different ranges of temperatures (33-41 degrees C), pH (6-8), and agitation rates (100-250 rpm) on the production process was calibrated using RSM using CCD as a statistical modality. In a 3.7 L bioreactor, 3.31 g/L hyaluronic acid was achieved at 9.74 percent molasses, 36.2 degrees C, pH 6.46, and a 207 rpm agitation rate using a batch fermentation technique. With a pH of 7, HPLC was conducted at 25 degrees C using a C18 column at a rate of 0.8 ml/min, and the wavelength was determined using a UV detector. The average retention time was 2.202 min. The FT-IR spectrum's output was also observed, and it matched the standard hyaluronic acid well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据