4.7 Article

Boosting the Humidity Performances of Na0.5BixTiO3 by Tuning Bi Content

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12142498

关键词

hydrothermal method; sensors; humidity sensing; linear response

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872001, 12174001]
  2. University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province [KJ2019A0019]
  3. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Anhui [2008085QA42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strategy of tuning the Bi content in the material was proposed to improve the sensing performance of humidity sensors. Experimental results showed that a proper reduction in Bi content can greatly enhance the sensing performance, improving the linear humidity response, hysteresis value, and response/recovery time of the sensor significantly.
In the field of humidity sensors, a major challenge is how to improve the sensing performance of existing materials. Based on our previous work on Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3, a facile strategy of tuning the Bi content in the material was proposed to improve its sensing performance. Na0.5BixTiO3 (x = 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.45) nanocomposites were synthesized by a hydrothermal method. Humidity sensing properties of these nanocomposites were investigated in the relative humidity range of 11% to 95%. Our results show that, compared to the sensor based on nominally pure sample (Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3), the sensor based on Na0.5Bi0.35TiO3 exhibits boosted sensing performance of excellent linear humidity response in the humidity range of 11-75% relative humidity, lower hysteresis value, and faster response/recovery time. The improvement of the sensing performance was argued to be the reason that the proper reduction in Bi content leads to a minimum value of oxygen-vacancy concentrations, thereby weakening the chemical adsorption but enhancing the physical adsorption. These results indicate that the proper underdose of the Bi content in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 can greatly boost the sensing performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据