4.7 Article

Feasibility of Silicon Quantum Dots as a Biomarker for the Bioimaging of Tear Film

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12121965

关键词

dry eye disease; tear film; quantum dots; fluorescence imaging; artificial tears

资金

  1. Faculty Research Grant, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia [FRG-PS43717]
  2. Faculty of Science Interdisciplinary Grant, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia [FRG-PS43717]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the fluorescence and biocompatibility of hydrophilic silicon quantum dots doped with scandium, copper, and zinc, indicating their potential for bioimaging of tear film. The results showed that there was no difference in fluorescence emission between scandium-doped and copper-doped silicon quantum dots at any concentration. In addition, scandium and copper-doped quantum dots exhibited brighter fluorescence emissions than zinc-doped quantum dots, and they had a wider safe concentration range.
This study investigated the fluorescence and biocompatibility of hydrophilic silicon quantum dots (SiQDs) that are doped with scandium (Sc-SiQDs), copper (Cu-SiQDs), and zinc (Zn-SiQDs), indicating their feasibility for the bioimaging of tear film. SiQDs were investigated for fluorescence emission by the in vitro imaging of artificial tears (TheraTears (R)), using an optical imaging system. A trypan blue exclusion test and MTT assay were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of SiQDs to cultured human corneal epithelial cells. No difference was observed between the fluorescence emission of Sc-SiQDs and Cu-SiQDs at any concentration. On average, SiQDs showed stable fluorescence, while Sc-SiQDs and Cu-SiQDs showed brighter fluorescence emissions than Zn-SiQDs. Cu-SiQDs and Sc-SiQDs showed a broader safe concentration range than Zn-SiQDs. Cu-SiQDs and Zn-SiQDs tend to aggregate more substantially in TheraTears (R) than Sc-SiQDs. This study elucidates the feasibility of hydrophilic Sc-SiQDs in studying the tear film's aqueous layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据