4.5 Article

Potential Toxicity of Natural Fibrous Zeolites: In Vitro Study Using Jurkat and HT22 Cell Lines

期刊

MINERALS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min12080988

关键词

erionite; mesolite; thomsonite; fibrous zeolites; cell lines; toxicity

资金

  1. Fibers a Multidisciplinary Mineralogical, CrystalChemical and Biological Project to Amend the Paradigm of Toxicity and Cancerogenicity of Mineral Fibers (PRIN: PROGETTI DI RICERCA DI RILEVANTE INTERESSE NAZIONALE-Bando, 2017) [20173X8WA4]
  2. Department of Pure and Applied Sciences of the University of Urbino Carlo Bo
  3. INAIL-BRIC ID60 Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the toxicity effects of selected fibrous zeolites on two different cellular models and found cytotoxic effects of erionite in both models. Additionally, the study revealed different toxic behaviors of mesolite and thomsonite fibers, suggesting other potential mechanisms of action.
An emerging problem for human health is the exposure to non-regulated mineral fibers with an asbestos-like crystal habit, particularly fibrous zeolites. This study aimed to determine if and how selected fibrous zeolites (erionite, mesolite, and thomsonite) induce toxicity effects on two different in vitro cellular models, the adherent murine hippocampal (HT22) and human immortalized T lymphocyte (Jurkat) cell lines. Before proceeding with the cellular tests, the three zeolite samples were investigated using scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction techniques. The cells were treated with 0.1 mu M and 1 mu M of fibrous erionite, mesolite, and thomsonite for 12, 24, and 48 h. Results showed a cytotoxic effect of erionite in both cellular models and revealed different toxic behaviors of the mesolite and thomsonite fibers, suggesting other potential mechanisms of action. The outcome of this study would be a first step for further research on fine biochemical interactions of zeolite fibers with cells and future in vivo investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据