4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Chemical-Looping Combustion of Hard Coal: Autothermal Operation of a 1 MWth Pilot Plant

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4032357

关键词

chemical-looping combustion; pilot plant; autothermal operation; CO2 capture; ilmenite; hard coal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) is an emerging carbon capture technology that is characterized by a low energy penalty, low carbon dioxide capture costs, and low environmental impact. To prevent the contact between fuel and air, an oxygen carrier is used to transport the oxygen needed for fuel conversion. In comparison to a classic oxyfuel process, no air separation unit is required to provide the oxygen needed to burn the fuel. The solid fuel, such as coal, is gasified in the fuel reactor (FR), and the products from gasification are oxidized by the oxygen carrier. There are promising results from the electrically heated 100 kWth unit at Chalmers University of Technology (Sweden) or the 1 MWth pilot at Technische Universitat Darmstadt (Germany) with partial chemical-looping conditions. The 1 MWth CLC pilot consists of two interconnected circulating fluidized bed reactors. It is possible to investigate this process without electrically heating due to refractory-lined reactors and coupling elements. This work presents the first results of autothermal operation of a metal oxide CLC unit worldwide using ilmenite as oxygen carrier and coarse hard coal as fuel. The FR was fluidized with steam. The results show that the oxygen demand of the FR required for a complete conversion of unconverted gases was in the range of 25%. At the same time, the carbon dioxide capture efficiency was low in the present configuration of the 1 MWth pilot. This means that unconverted char left the FR and burned in the air reactor (AR). The reason for this is that no carbon stripper unit was used during these investigations. A carbon stripper could significantly enhance the carbon dioxide capture efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据