4.6 Article

A Clinical Case of a Homozygous Deletion in the APOA5 Gene with Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

期刊

GENES
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13061062

关键词

hypertriglyceridemia; pancreatitis; cardiovascular disease; APOA5; LPL; mutation; gene panel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypertriglyceridemia is a common lipid metabolism disorder, and its severe form is associated with mutations in the LPL, APOC2, LMF1, and APOA5 genes. This case report presents a severe case of hypertriglyceridemia in a consanguineous family, caused by a homozygous deletion in the APOA5 gene. Additionally, a polymorphism in the LPL gene was found to worsen the disease course.
Background: Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is one of the most common forms of lipid metabolism disorders. The leading clinical manifestations are pancreatitis, atherosclerotic vascular lesions, and the formation of eruptive xanthomas. The most severe type of HTG is primary (or hereditary) hypertriglyceridemia, linked to pathogenic genetic variants in LPL, APOC2, LMF1, and APOA5 genes. Case: We present a clinical case of severe primary hypertriglyceridemia (TG level > 55 mmol/L in a 4-year-old boy) in a consanguineous family. The disease developed due to a previously undescribed homozygous deletion in the APOA5 gene (NM_052968: c.579_592delATACGCCGAGAGCC p.Tyr194Gly*68). We also evaluate the clinical significance of a genetic variant in the LPL gene (NM_000237.2: c.106G>A (rs1801177) p.Asp36Asn), which was previously described as a polymorphism. In one family, we also present a different clinical significance even in heterozygous carriers: from hypertriglyceridemia to normotriglyceridemia. We provide evidence that this heterogeneity has developed due to polymorphism in the LPL gene, which plays the role of an additional trigger. Conclusions: The homozygous deletion of the APOA5 gene is responsible for the severe hypertriglyceridemia, and another SNP in the LPL gene worsens the course of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据