4.7 Article

Human parainfluenza 3 and respiratory syncytial viruses detected in pangolins

期刊

EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 1657-1663

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2086071

关键词

Pangolin; zoonotic diseases; Metagenomic sequencing; human respiratory diseases; virus transmission vector

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2020YFC0840805]
  2. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering
  3. Guangxi Medical University Training Program for Distinguished Young Scholars
  4. Guangxi Scientific and Technological Research [GUIKEAB20059002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the virome composition of pangolins and reveals that pangolins are susceptible to human parainfluenza virus and human respiratory syncytial virus. This finding highlights the potential risk of viral transmission from pangolins to humans and emphasizes the need for public awareness.
Pangolins have gained increasing global attention owing to their public health significance as potential zoonotic hosts since the identification of SARS-CoV-2-related viruses in them. Moreover, these animals could carry other respiratory viruses. In this study, we investigated the virome composition of 16 pangolins that died in 2018 with symptoms of pneumonia using metagenomic approaches. A total of eight whole virus sequences belonging to the Paramyxoviridae or Pneumoviridae families were identified, including one human parainfluenza virus 3, one human respiratory syncytial virus A, and six human respiratory syncytial virus B. All of these sequences showed more than 99% nucleotide identity with the virus isolated from humans at the whole-genome level and clustered with human viruses in the phylogenetic tree. Our findings provide evidence that pangolins are susceptible to HPIV3 and HRSV infection. Therefore, public awareness of the threat of pangolin-borne pathogens is essential to stop their human consumption and to prevent zoonotic viral transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据