4.6 Article

Impact of Hydrothermally Prepared Support on the Catalytic Properties of CuCe Oxide for Preferential CO Oxidation Reaction

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12060674

关键词

ceria; copper; catalyst; CO oxidation; PrOx; hydrogen; hydrothermal

资金

  1. Research Committee of the University of Patras in Greece, via K. Karatheodori program [E.610]
  2. Inter-Governmental Cooperative Key Special Project under National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0184100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CuCe mixed oxides are commonly used for preferential CO oxidation in the purification of hydrogen-rich gas stream. This study investigated the synthesis of various ceria supports and the preparation of CuCe mixed-oxide catalysts. It found that modifying the hydrothermal parameters can tune the properties of the supports, leading to highly active and selective catalysts. The nature of the reduced copper species and the optimum content in oxygen vacancies play crucial roles in the catalytic performance.
CuCe mixed oxide is one of the most studied catalytic systems for preferential CO oxidation (CO-PrOx) for the purification of hydrogen-rich gas stream. In this study, a series of ceria supports were prepared via a citrates-hydrothermal route by altering the synthesis parameters (concentration and temperature). The resulting supports were used for the preparation of CuCe mixed-oxide catalysts via wet impregnation. Various physicochemical techniques were utilized for the characterization of the resulting materials, whereas the CuCe oxide catalysts were assessed in CO-PrOx reaction. Through the proper modification of the hydrothermal parameters, CeO2 supports with tunable properties can be formed, thus targeting the formation of highly active and selective catalysts. The nature of the reduced copper species and the optimum content in oxygen vacancies seems to be the key factors behind the remarkable catalytic performance of a CO-PrOx reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据