4.3 Article

A data-driven stacking fusion approach for pedestrian trajectory prediction

期刊

TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 548-571

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2022.2103050

关键词

Pedestrian trajectory prediction; pedestrians-dynamic vehicles interactions; Attention Mechanism-Long Short-Term Memory Network (Att-LSTM); Modified Social Force Model (MSFM); stacking fusion model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper systematically investigates pedestrian trajectory prediction through a data-driven stacking fusion approach. The proposed Att-LSTM and MSFM models outperform existing methods in terms of pedestrian trajectory prediction. The results show that the stacking fusion model has great feasibility for improving pedestrian safety and traffic efficiency in autonomous vehicles.
This paper systematically investigates pedestrian trajectory prediction through a data-driven stacking fusion approach. Firstly, a novel Attention Mechanism-Long Short-Term Memory Network (Att-LSTM) is presented for pedestrian trajectory prediction, pedestrian heterogeneity and pedestrians-dynamic vehicles interactions are considered. Then, a Modified Social Force Model (MSFM) is developed for pedestrian trajectory prediction. The collision avoidance with conflicting dynamic vehicles and pedestrians, the influence of crosswalk boundary and pedestrian heterogeneity are considered. Finally, a data-driven stacking fusion model based on the Att-LSTM and MSFM is developed, and ridge model is used to prevent model overfitting and enhance model robustness. Moreover, traffic data of an un-signalised crosswalk is collected; the non-measurable parameters are calibrated through the Maximum-Likelihood Estimation. The model evaluation results show that the stacking fusion model performs better than the existing methods, which make it possible for autonomous vehicle to present great feasibility for improving pedestrian safety and traffic efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据