4.5 Article

AgGaGeSe4: An Infrared Nonlinear Quaternary Selenide with Good Performance

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym14071426

关键词

nonlinear optical crystal; crystal structure; optical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The symmetry of crystals is an important property, and they can be categorized into centrosymmetric and non-centrosymmetric crystals. This paper introduces the synthesis and property analysis of a new infrared nonlinear optical material, AgGaGeSe4, which shows better optical properties compared to AgGaSe2 and can be used as a good infrared NLO material.
The symmetry of crystals is an extremely important property of crystals. Crystals can be divided into centrosymmetric and non-centrosymmetric crystals. In this paper, an infrared (IR) nonlinear optical (NLO) material AgGaGeSe4 was synthesized. The related performance analysis, nonlinear optical properties, and first-principle calculation of AgGaGeSe4 were also introduced in detail. In the AgGaGeSe4 structure, Ge4+ was replaced with Ga3+ and produced the same number of vacancies at the Ag+ position. The low content of Ge doping kept the original chalcopyrite structure and improved its optical properties such as the band gap. The UV-Vis diffuse reflection spectrum shows that the experimental energy band gap of AgGaGeSe4 is 2.27 eV, which is 0.48 eV larger than that of AgGaSe2 (1.79 eV). From the perspective of charge-transfer engineering strategy, the introduction of Group IV Ge elements into the crystal structure of AgGaSe2 effectively improves its band gap. The second harmonic generation (SHG) effect of AgGaGeSe4 is similar to that of AgGaSe2, and at 1064 nm wavelength, the birefringence of AgGaGeSe4 is 0.03, which is greater than that of AgGaSe2 ( increment n = 0.02). The results show that AgGaGeSe4 possessed better optical properties than AgGaSe2, and can been broadly applied as a good infrared NLO material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据